Production Scheduling ReviewsEvery score sourced, every price dated

Home › Best lists

Best Production Planning Software 2026

✓ Verified 13 Oct 202612 products7 published criteriaNext check Jan 2027
Short answer. As of October 2026, SkyPlanner APS ranks #1 with 94 of 100 because it turns the plan into a finite capacity schedule and Autopilot reschedules it continuously, connecting to any ERP or MES through a two-way REST API, from 199 euros per month, 5 workstations included, 20 euros per month per extra workstation. frePPLe ranks #2 with 81 because it generates finite-material plans with proposed purchase and distribution orders across locations.

This list is for

  • Manufacturers whose ERP or MRP plans materials but cannot check capacity
  • Discrete and process plants of any size that plan to order or to stock
  • Buyers choosing between an ERP planning module, a new ERP and a scheduler on top
  • Groups planning several plants in one schedule
  • Budgets from public monthly subscriptions to ERP suites sold by quote

This list is not for

#1 PRODUCTION PLANNING
1RANK
SkyPlanner APS APSPublic pricing
★★★★★4.7/ 5 on this list
Manufacturers of any size that want finite capacity scheduling with automatic rescheduling on top of their ERP
From €199/mo5 workstations included, then €20/mo per extra workstation
30 daystrial, no card
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth5.0Material requirements and availability planning4.0Automatic rescheduling5.0ERP integration path5.0What-if scenarios for new orders5.0Price transparency4.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule5.0

Ranked here because: SkyPlanner APS scores 5 of 5 on six of seven criteria: finite capacity across workstation limits, shifts, materials, skills and setups; Autopilot continuous rescheduling with the Arcturus engine; simulated sales orders scheduled against real load and materials and reviewed side by side before accepting; and AI-assisted self-onboarding with demo data, tutorial videos, a Getting Started guide and the built-in AI agent. To pull orders in and push planned dates back, it connects to any ERP or MES through a two-way REST API with webhooks and CSV import; customer projects have connected SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Epicor, Sage and Siemens. As of October 2026 it costs from 199 euros per month, 5 workstations included, 20 euros per month per extra workstation, with a 30-day trial and no card for up to 20 workstations, so production planners can budget it before a sales call. Pick it if your ERP plans materials but cannot tell you whether the plant can build the plan, at any company size.

Not a fit if: You need a free-forever plan.

2RANK
frePPLe Open sourceFree tier
★★★★☆4.1/ 5
Manufacturers that want an open-source finite capacity planning engine connected to Odoo or another ERP
Freefree tier; paid plans quoted
15 daysfree trial
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth5.0Material requirements and availability planning5.0Automatic rescheduling3.0ERP integration path4.0What-if scenarios for new orders5.0Price transparency1.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule3.0

Ranked here because: frePPLe scores 5 of 5 on finite capacity, material planning and what-if scenarios: it generates finite-material, finite-capacity plans with proposed purchase and distribution orders across locations, and its sandbox scenarios simulate a rush order before it is accepted. It names Odoo and connects to other ERPs through a REST API, CSV or Excel files or database access (4 of 5). As of October 2026 a proof of concept takes 1 to 2 weeks according to the vendor. Pick it for multi-location material and supply planning, run as a project with the vendor.

Not a fit if: You need the plan to replan on events (frePPLe starts plan generation manually or on a predefined schedule, and incremental or event-driven replanning is not described, 3 of 5) or a published subscription price, which is shown only as a placeholder as of October 2026 (1 of 5).

3RANK
Odoo Manufacturing Open sourcePublic pricing
★★★★☆3.5/ 5
Small manufacturers that want finite capacity planning inside the Odoo ERP
€19.90/user/moper user
Free tierOne App Free: one app,…
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth3.0Material requirements and availability planning5.0Automatic rescheduling3.0ERP integration path3.0What-if scenarios for new orders3.0Price transparency4.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule3.0

Ranked here because: Odoo Manufacturing scores 5 of 5 on material planning, with a master production schedule, just-in-time replenishment proposals to make, buy or subcontract, and component availability checks. It states finite capacity planning with a Gantt view (3 of 5), and linked work orders can be rescheduled automatically with the default Auto-Reschedule (Keep Buffer) setting (3 of 5). Prices are public from 19.90 euros per user per month as of October 2026. Pick it if you want MRP, planning and the rest of the ERP in one low-cost suite.

Not a fit if: You must connect another ERP: the external API is available only on the Custom plan, and Odoo publishes consultant hours in its success packs but no calendar time to a first realistic schedule as of October 2026.

4RANK
MRPeasy MRP-ERPPublic pricing
★★★☆☆3.3/ 5
Small manufacturers that want MRP, inventory and accounting connections in one cloud tool
$49/user/moper user
15+15 daystrial, no card
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth3.0Material requirements and availability planning5.0Automatic rescheduling2.0ERP integration path2.0What-if scenarios for new orders3.0Price transparency5.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule3.0

Ranked here because: MRPeasy scores 5 of 5 on material planning: it forecasts procurement requirements, creates pre-filled purchase orders and starts jobs when materials are on hand. Its pricing page lists finite capacity operations scheduling (3 of 5), and quotes show a shipping date calculated from the current schedule and material lead times (3 of 5). Prices are public at $49 to $149 per user per month as of October 2026, with go-live in 1 to 3 months and self-service onboarding. Pick it if you are replacing spreadsheets with MRP and accounting in one tool.

Not a fit if: You need automatic rescheduling of work already started: a quantity change replans unstarted orders, but started operations are moved by hand (2 of 5).

5RANK
Epicor Kinetic MRP-ERPQuote only
★★★☆☆3.2/ 5
Discrete and make-to-order manufacturers, single-site or multi-site, that want ERP, MRP and advanced planning and scheduling in one system
Quoteno public price
Nonedemo only
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth4.0Material requirements and availability planning5.0Automatic rescheduling2.0ERP integration path3.0What-if scenarios for new orders4.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule0.0

Ranked here because: Epicor Kinetic scores 5 of 5 on material planning with multilevel MRP, forecasting, master production scheduling and cross-plant planning, and 4 of 5 on finite capacity, where Kinetic APS adds multiple-constraint and capability-based scheduling. Real-time capable-to-promise and the change impact informer test a new order before committing (4 of 5), and an open REST API exposes all Kinetic services through OData v4. Pick it if you are replacing your ERP and want planning inside it.

Not a fit if: You keep your current ERP, need a published price or onboarding time (neither is published as of October 2026), or want event-driven automatic rescheduling, which Epicor does not state (2 of 5).

6RANK
★★★☆☆3.1/ 5
Small and midsize industrial manufacturers that want ERP and finite capacity planning in one Infor cloud system
Quoteno public price
Nonedemo only
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth4.0Material requirements and availability planning4.0Automatic rescheduling3.0ERP integration path2.0What-if scenarios for new orders5.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule1.0

Ranked here because: Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine) scores 5 of 5 on what-if scenarios: Get ATP/CTP plans a new order in a test copy of the plan and returns a capable-to-promise date before inserting it. Its APS mode sets resources to finite capacity (4 of 5, separately licensed), APS planning pulls demand through routings and replenishes safety stock (4 of 5), and Plan on Save inserts new orders into the existing plan (3 of 5). Pick it if you run SyteLine or are choosing an ERP where capable-to-promise dates decide.

Not a fit if: You need a published price or onboarding time: Infor publishes no price and no go-live duration as of October 2026 (it says only that preconfigured workflows and templates cut implementation time), and its Velocity Suite advertises one flat fee with no figure.

7RANK
Siemens Opcenter APS APSQuote only
★★★☆☆3.0/ 5
Enterprise manufacturers that need real-time rescheduling across several plants
Quoteno public price
30 daysfree trial
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth4.0Material requirements and availability planning3.0Automatic rescheduling4.0ERP integration path1.0What-if scenarios for new orders5.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule2.0

Ranked here because: Siemens Opcenter APS scores 5 of 5 on what-if scenarios: Scheduling Standard offers what-if simulations, impact analysis and capable-to-promise. It schedules in finite or infinite capacity mode (4 of 5) and states real-time dynamic schedule adjustment (4 of 5). As of October 2026 a free 30-day Scheduling Standard trial starts in minutes. Pick it for a scheduling-led plant that is ready to buy through a sales quote.

Not a fit if: You need named ERP connectors or a public price: Siemens states only a generic ERP and MES integration (1 of 5) and publishes no price as of October 2026.

8RANK
★★★☆☆2.8/ 5
Multi-subsidiary companies that want manufacturing planning inside the NetSuite ERP
Quoteno public price
Trial not stated
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth3.0Material requirements and availability planning5.0Automatic rescheduling2.0ERP integration path2.0What-if scenarios for new orders3.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule2.0

Ranked here because: Oracle NetSuite scores 5 of 5 on material planning: Supply Planning uses BOMs, inventory and the master production schedule to create planned work, purchase and transfer orders. Advanced Manufacturing adds finite capacity scheduling that considers current and future capacity (3 of 5), and several supply plans can be generated and compared (3 of 5). Pick it if you already run NetSuite and want planning on native work orders.

Not a fit if: You need automatic rescheduling (the Manufacturing Scheduler reschedules by drag and drop, 2 of 5) or a published price; NetSuite publishes no price as of October 2026, and its SuiteSuccess target of going live in 100 days or less is ERP-wide, not a time to a first schedule.

9RANK
PlanetTogether APSQuote only
★★★☆☆2.8/ 5
Manufacturers that buy through a sales-led demo and need named integrations with SAP, NetSuite or Kinaxis Maestro
Quoteno public price
Nonedemo only
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth3.0Material requirements and availability planning3.0Automatic rescheduling1.0ERP integration path4.0What-if scenarios for new orders5.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule3.0

Ranked here because: PlanetTogether scores 5 of 5 on what-if scenarios: sandbox scenarios are compared by KPI, and Capable-To-Promise gives delivery estimates for new orders. It names integrations with SAP, NetSuite, Kinaxis Maestro, AVEVA and Aptean Ross (4 of 5) and connects material availability to the schedule while leaving the MRP calculation to the ERP (3 of 5). Pick it if scenario comparison for sales is your deciding need and your ERP is one of its named integrations.

Not a fit if: You want the plan to reschedule itself or a quick start: PlanetTogether lists only alerts and rescheduling tools (1 of 5), publishes no price, and states standard implementations of 4 to 6 months as of October 2026.

10RANK
Asprova APSQuote only
★★★☆☆2.6/ 5
Enterprise multi-plant manufacturers that need finite capacity scheduling with documented ERP interfaces
Quoteno public price
Free trial download after free Asprova ID registration; length not statedfree trial
Yesfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth4.0Material requirements and availability planning3.0Automatic rescheduling1.0ERP integration path3.0What-if scenarios for new orders3.0Price transparency0.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule2.0

Ranked here because: Asprova states finite capacity scheduling (4 of 5), and Visual Management gives delivery date quotations from a schedule several months ahead (3 of 5). Its e-learning names SAP, QAD, JD Edwards and Dynamics AX interfaces (3 of 5), and a printed circuit board case schedules component preparation in sync with line start times. Pick it for detailed finite scheduling in a plant that plans a long implementation.

Not a fit if: You need automatic rescheduling (documented only as a manual reschedule command, 1 of 5) or a fast start: implementation usually takes 4 to 6 months and the package price is an open price as of October 2026.

11RANK
Katana MRP-ERPPublic pricing
★★☆☆☆2.4/ 5
Growing multi-channel product businesses that sell through stores such as Shopify
Freefree plan
15 daysfree trial
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth1.0Material requirements and availability planning4.0Automatic rescheduling3.0ERP integration path2.0What-if scenarios for new orders2.0Price transparency2.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule3.0

Ranked here because: Katana scores 4 of 5 on material planning: it shows stock on hand, committed and arriving, and creates purchase orders from inventory needs and lead times. As of October 2026 a free plan covers 30 SKUs and a self-serve start takes one day (3 of 5). Integrations name Shopify, Amazon, QuickBooks Online and Xero. Pick it for a maker selling online that needs inventory-led planning.

Not a fit if: You need finite capacity scheduling: capacity is calculated from weekly throughput over five weekdays with no explicit finite capacity claim (1 of 5), and its what-if support is limited to deadlines estimated automatically from production capacity, with no scenario comparison or capable-to-promise stated (2 of 5).

12RANK
Monitor ERP MRP-ERPPublic pricing
★★☆☆☆2.4/ 5
Small and growing manufacturers that want ERP and planning in one cloud system
€93/user/moper user
Noneno trial stated
Not statedfinite capacity
Finite capacity scheduling depth2.0Material requirements and availability planning4.0Automatic rescheduling1.0ERP integration path2.0What-if scenarios for new orders1.0Price transparency4.0Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule2.0

Ranked here because: Monitor ERP scores 4 of 5 on material planning: its stock module calculates requirements and net requirements. Loading plans in lists and charts and pool planning for equivalent machines score 2 of 5 on finite capacity. The price is public from 93 euros per user per month as of October 2026. Pick it if you want a module-based ERP with requirements planning and integrations for nesting, PDM, CAD and EDI.

Not a fit if: You need what-if checks for new orders (the sales module checks delivery times, but no what-if simulation is described, 1 of 5) or automatic replanning, which Monitor does not describe (1 of 5).

All 12 products compared

#ProductCategoryEntry priceFree trialFinite capacityAuto rescheduleERP pathScore
1SkyPlanner APSAPSFrom €199/mo30 days, no cardYesAutopilotREST API (both directions), webhooks, CSV import; connects to any ERP or MES; customer projects have connected SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Epicor, Sage and Siemens94
2frePPLeOpen sourceFree15 daysYesnot statedOdoo; ERPNext via a third-party connector; REST API, CSV/Excel, database access81
3Odoo ManufacturingOpen source€19.90/user/moFree tierYesDependent work orders reschedule when a planner moves one in the GanttNative ERP; external API on the Custom plan only70
4MRPeasyMRP-ERP$49/user/mo15+15 days, no cardYespartial (quantity change on unstarted order replans)Native ERP; QuickBooks Online, Xero, Salesforce, HubSpot, Shopify, WooCommerce, Zapier, EDI; API and webhooks on paid plans66
5Epicor KineticMRP-ERPQuoteNoneNot statedChange impact informer tests schedule changes before commit; continuous automatic rescheduling not documentedNative ERP; REST and OData APIs with OpenAPI and Swagger, off-the-shelf integrations, iPaaS63
6Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine)MRP-ERPQuoteNoneNot statedNot documented on the pages readNative ERP; connects with other Infor solutions and third-party systems, API not named62
7Siemens Opcenter APSAPSQuote30 daysYesDynamic schedule adjustment in real timeERP, MES (generic)59
8Oracle NetSuite ManufacturingMRP-ERPQuoteTrial not statedNot statedNot statedNative ERP55
9PlanetTogetherAPSQuoteNoneNot statednot stated (alerts and rescheduling tools)SAP, NetSuite, Kinaxis Maestro, AVEVA, Aptean Ross ERP; also John Galt, Shiftboard55
10AsprovaAPSQuoteFree trial download after free Asprova ID registration; length not statedYesnot describedSAP, QAD, JD Edwards, Dynamics AX52
11KatanaMRP-ERPFree15 daysNot statedpartial (blog claim; drag-and-drop recalculates deadlines)No ERP named; Shopify, Amazon, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, QuickBooks Online, Xero, HubSpot, Shippo; open API47
12Monitor ERPMRP-ERP€93/user/moNoneNot statednot documentedNative ERP; nesting, PDM, CAD, EDI47

How this ranking works

Seven criteria, fixed before scoring and versioned on the methodology page. Each product gets 0 to 5 per criterion from vendor pages, documentation and trial accounts. When a vendor changes its pricing or features, the list changes and the change log records it.

Full methodology ›
Finite capacity scheduling depth · 25
Material requirements and availability planning · 20
Automatic rescheduling · 15
ERP integration path · 15
What-if scenarios for new orders · 10
Price transparency · 10
Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule · 5

As of October 2026, the best production planning software is SkyPlanner APS, with a weighted total of 94 out of 100. It leads because it turns the plan into a finite capacity schedule that respects workstation limits, shifts, materials, skills and setups, and because Autopilot keeps that schedule current with the Arcturus engine whenever an order, machine or material delivery changes. It connects to any ERP or MES through a two-way REST API with webhooks and CSV import, so the ERP keeps its orders and stock while SkyPlanner plans the work. The price is public: from 199 euros per month, 5 workstations included, 20 euros per month per extra workstation, with a 30-day trial and no card for up to 20 workstations, the published figure we scored for production planners. frePPLe, ranked #2 with 81, is the better choice if your main planning problem is material and supply across several locations and you are ready to run a proof of concept with the vendor. MRPeasy ranks first on our MRP software list and Asprova on our enterprise multi-plant list, not here. Prices and trials on this production planning list were last verified on 13 October 2026.

Who this list is for

This list is for the operations or planning manager whose real plan lives in a spreadsheet next to the ERP. The MRP run says what to make and buy and in which week, but nobody can say whether the plant can build it by the promised date. Orders change daily, a supplier delivery slips, a machine stops, and the sales team asks for a delivery date the planner cannot check on the spot. The decision on the table is rarely “which planning tool” in the abstract. It is one of three choices: use the planning module of the ERP you already run, replace the ERP with one that plans better, or keep the ERP and add a scheduler on top. This list ranks all three kinds of product on the same seven criteria so those choices can be compared directly. Groups that plan several plants are covered too: SkyPlanner APS schedules several factories in one environment, with workstation groups per site.

How we ranked production planning software

Seven criteria are weighted for production planning, fixed before any vendor was scored. A production plan has two halves, materials and capacity, and a plan that ignores either half fails on the floor, so those two carry 45 percent together. Production planning scores come from vendor sites, pricing pages, documentation and case studies; a capability the vendor does not publish scores zero.

  • Finite capacity scheduling depth, 25 percent: the plan must fit the hours that machines, shifts and people actually have. This is the gap most ERP planning modules leave open, so it carries the most weight.
  • Material requirements and availability planning, 20 percent: the plan must know what is in stock, what is on order and what each job consumes, or a job lands on a day its parts are missing.
  • Automatic rescheduling, 15 percent: a plan is out of date the first time an order or delivery changes, and software that replans by itself keeps it usable.
  • ERP integration path, 15 percent: orders, stock and confirmations must flow both ways with the ERP. ERP suites are scored on their open API, because their planning is already inside the ERP.
  • What-if scenarios for new orders, 10 percent: testing a new order against real load before accepting it is the question sales asks every day.
  • Price transparency, 10 percent: a published price lets a buyer budget before a sales call.
  • Onboarding speed to first realistic schedule, 5 percent: how fast a plan built on your own data appears.

Weighted scores add up to a total out of 100. MRPeasy, at 66, sits four points behind Odoo Manufacturing at 70 as of October 2026; one verified fact raising MRPeasy on finite capacity scheduling depth from 3 to 4 would add 5 points, lift it to 71 and put it into the top 3 past Odoo at 70. The full rules are on our methodology page.

When an ERP or MRP planning module is enough and when you need a scheduler

Production planning software comes in three forms, and the scores on this list show where each one stops.

  • MRP systems calculate what to make and buy, and when, from the bill of materials, stock and demand. Classic MRP assumes every work center has unlimited hours. MRPeasy and Odoo Manufacturing score 5 of 5 on material planning here, and 3 of 5 on finite capacity.
  • ERP planning modules plan inside the ERP that already holds the orders, so there is nothing to integrate. Epicor Kinetic and Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine) reach 4 of 5 on finite capacity, Epicor through Kinetic APS and Infor through a separately licensed APS mode; Oracle NetSuite scores 3 of 5. Their automatic rescheduling scores are 2, 3 and 2 of 5: Epicor tests a change before committing it, Infor inserts new orders into the existing plan on save, and NetSuite reschedules by drag and drop.
  • APS schedulers such as SkyPlanner APS, PlanetTogether, Siemens Opcenter APS and Asprova build a finite capacity schedule next to the ERP and leave the ERP its orders, stock and accounting.

A planning module is enough when three things hold: work centers are rarely overloaded, lead times are long enough that a weekly MRP run absorbs most changes, and customers accept quoted dates without asking for proof. A scheduler is needed as soon as one of them breaks: the MRP plan regularly asks a bottleneck for more hours than it has, the planner rebuilds the plan by hand after every rush order or late delivery, or sales needs a dependable date for a new order the same day. In that situation the lowest-risk fix is usually to keep the ERP and add a scheduler that reads its orders and writes back dates, which is exactly what the ERP integration criterion tests. SkyPlanner APS scores 4 of 5 on material planning in that role: it projects stock forward from stock, purchase orders, reservations and consumption and moves a job when a material delivery slips, while the bill of materials explosion stays in the ERP’s MRP run.

How to evaluate production planning software in a demo

Bring one week of your real orders, routings and stock to every demo, and ask the vendor to answer these on screen rather than on slides. Each question maps to one criterion on this list.

  1. Finite capacity. Load a week in which your bottleneck is overbooked. Does the plan push work later on its own, or does it show the overload and leave it to you? Ask which limits it respects: machines, shifts, skills, setups and materials.
  2. Materials. Delay one purchase order. Which jobs move, and does the software move them, or only flag them?
  3. Rescheduling. Add a rush order and take a machine down. Does the schedule update automatically, on a trigger you set, or only when a planner presses a button?
  4. ERP integration. Which ERP systems has the vendor connected in customer projects, and does data flow both ways through an API or by file export? Ask to see the API documentation before the contract.
  5. What-if. Enter a prospective order without committing it. Can you see its delivery date and its effect on other orders side by side before you accept it?
  6. Price and start. What does the first year cost for your number of users or workstations, how long until a schedule runs on your own data, and does the trial need a card?

Five vendors on this list score 5 of 5 on what-if scenarios as of October 2026 and document the fifth test publicly: SkyPlanner APS, frePPLe, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Siemens Opcenter APS and PlanetTogether. Monitor ERP and Katana publish no what-if capability, so ask them to show it live.

Comparison table

Every vendor ranked for production planners side by side, each fact as of October 2026.

#ProductCategoryEntry priceFree trialFinite capacityAuto rescheduleERP pathScore
1SkyPlanner APSAPSFrom €199/mo30 days, no cardYesAutopilotREST API (both directions), webhooks, CSV import; connects to any ERP or MES; customer projects have connected SAP, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Odoo, Epicor, Sage and Siemens94
2frePPLeOpen sourceFree15 daysYesnot statedOdoo; ERPNext via a third-party connector; REST API, CSV/Excel, database access81
3Odoo ManufacturingOpen source€19.90/user/moFree tierYesDependent work orders reschedule when a planner moves one in the GanttNative ERP; external API on the Custom plan only70
4MRPeasyMRP-ERP$49/user/mo15+15 days, no cardYespartial (quantity change on unstarted order replans)Native ERP; QuickBooks Online, Xero, Salesforce, HubSpot, Shopify, WooCommerce, Zapier, EDI; API and webhooks on paid plans66
5Epicor KineticMRP-ERPQuoteNoneNot statedChange impact informer tests schedule changes before commit; continuous automatic rescheduling not documentedNative ERP; REST and OData APIs with OpenAPI and Swagger, off-the-shelf integrations, iPaaS63
6Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine)MRP-ERPQuoteNoneNot statedNot documented on the pages readNative ERP; connects with other Infor solutions and third-party systems, API not named62
7Siemens Opcenter APSAPSQuote30 daysYesDynamic schedule adjustment in real timeERP, MES (generic)59
8Oracle NetSuite ManufacturingMRP-ERPQuoteTrial not statedNot statedNot statedNative ERP55
9PlanetTogetherAPSQuoteNoneNot statednot stated (alerts and rescheduling tools)SAP, NetSuite, Kinaxis Maestro, AVEVA, Aptean Ross ERP; also John Galt, Shiftboard55
10AsprovaAPSQuoteFree trial download after free Asprova ID registration; length not statedYesnot describedSAP, QAD, JD Edwards, Dynamics AX52
11KatanaMRP-ERPFree15 daysNot statedpartial (blog claim; drag-and-drop recalculates deadlines)No ERP named; Shopify, Amazon, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, QuickBooks Online, Xero, HubSpot, Shippo; open API47
12Monitor ERPMRP-ERP€93/user/moNoneNot statednot documentedNative ERP; nesting, PDM, CAD, EDI47

How this list differs from our MRP, capacity and APS lists

This list scores planning as a whole: materials and capacity together, with an ERP integration weight that rewards tools able to plan alongside an existing ERP. Our MRP software list puts material planning and inventory and purchasing control first, which is why MRPeasy wins there with 92 and ranks fourth here with 66. Our capacity planning list drops material planning and adds capacity load views and bottleneck analysis; SkyPlanner APS leads it with 98. The APS software list ranks dedicated schedulers on optimizer engine and multi-site scheduling, with SkyPlanner APS first at 96, and the ERP add-on list ranks tools that sit on top of an ERP, where SkyPlanner APS also leads with 96. Read this list while you are still deciding which kind of tool you need, and those lists once you know. For the background, see our guides on APS vs an ERP planning module and APS vs MRP.

Ranked first elsewhere

Other buyers have other winners. Outside this production planning list, as of October 2026, these vendors rank first:

Related: our guide on finite vs infinite capacity and the make-to-order and mid-size manufacturers lists.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best production planning software?

As of October 2026, SkyPlanner APS ranks first on our production planning list with a weighted total of 94, ahead of frePPLe (81) and Odoo Manufacturing (70). SkyPlanner scores 5 of 5 on finite capacity, automatic rescheduling, ERP integration, what-if scenarios and onboarding, and 4 of 5 on price transparency.

Is APS software the same as production scheduling software?

Not quite. APS (advanced planning and scheduling) software plans against finite capacity, so it never books more hours on a machine, shift or crew than exist. Many MRP and ERP planning modules plan materials first and leave the capacity check to the planner; on this list finite capacity carries 25 percent of the weight.

Is my ERP's production planning module enough, or do I need a scheduler?

An ERP planning module is enough when work centers are rarely overloaded and customers accept quoted dates without checking. Add a scheduler when the MRP plan regularly exceeds bottleneck hours or the plan is rebuilt by hand after rush orders. As of October 2026, SkyPlanner APS adds a finite capacity schedule to any ERP through a two-way REST API, from 199 euros per month, 5 workstations included, 20 euros per month per extra workstation.

What is the difference between production planning and production scheduling?

Production planning decides what to make, how much and by which week, from demand, stock and the bill of materials. Production scheduling decides which machine and shift runs each operation, in which order, within real capacity. On this list material planning carries 20 percent of the weight and finite capacity scheduling 25 percent, because buyers need both.

How much does production planning software cost?

As of October 2026, SkyPlanner APS costs from 199 euros per month, 5 workstations included, 20 euros per month per extra workstation, so production planners can budget it before a sales call. MRPeasy publishes $49 to $149 per user per month, Monitor ERP from 93 euros per user per month and Odoo Manufacturing from 19.90 euros per user per month, and Katana has a free plan for 30 SKUs. Epicor Kinetic, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Oracle NetSuite, Siemens Opcenter APS, PlanetTogether and Asprova publish no price, and frePPLe shows its subscription as a placeholder.

Which production planning software reschedules automatically?

As of October 2026, SkyPlanner APS scores 5 of 5: Autopilot replans within set limits on every meaningful change with the Arcturus engine. Siemens Opcenter APS scores 4 of 5 for real-time dynamic schedule adjustment, and Odoo Manufacturing, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Katana and frePPLe score 3 of 5, where frePPLe starts plan generation on a predefined schedule. Epicor Kinetic, MRPeasy and Oracle NetSuite score 2 of 5, and PlanetTogether, Monitor ERP and Asprova score 1 of 5.

Can production planning software give a delivery date for a new order before I accept it?

Yes, through capable-to-promise or what-if scenarios. Five vendors score 5 of 5 on our production planning list as of October 2026: SkyPlanner APS schedules a simulated order against real load, capacity and materials, and frePPLe, Infor CloudSuite Industrial, Siemens Opcenter APS and PlanetTogether offer sandbox scenarios or capable-to-promise dates.

Sources

  1. SkyPlanner APS pricing page (price, trial), checked 13 Oct 2026
  2. SkyPlanner APS: finite capacity, checked 13 Oct 2026
  3. SkyPlanner APS: material planning, rescheduling, ERP integration, what-if scenarios, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  4. PlanetTogether: finite capacity, ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  5. PlanetTogether: material planning, checked 13 Oct 2026
  6. PlanetTogether: rescheduling, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  7. PlanetTogether: what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  8. PlanetTogether: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  9. Siemens Opcenter APS: finite capacity, rescheduling, ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  10. Siemens Opcenter APS: material planning, checked 13 Oct 2026
  11. Siemens Opcenter APS: what-if scenarios, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  12. Siemens Opcenter APS: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  13. Asprova: finite capacity, rescheduling, checked 13 Oct 2026
  14. Asprova: material planning, checked 13 Oct 2026
  15. Asprova: ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  16. Asprova: what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  17. Asprova: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  18. Asprova: onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  19. MRPeasy: finite capacity, ERP integration, pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  20. MRPeasy: material planning, checked 13 Oct 2026
  21. MRPeasy: rescheduling, checked 13 Oct 2026
  22. MRPeasy: what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  23. MRPeasy: onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  24. Odoo Manufacturing: finite capacity, material planning, what-if scenarios, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  25. Odoo Manufacturing: rescheduling, checked 13 Oct 2026
  26. Odoo Manufacturing: ERP integration, pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  27. Epicor Kinetic: finite capacity, material planning, rescheduling, what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  28. Epicor Kinetic: ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  29. Epicor Kinetic: pricing, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  30. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine): finite capacity, checked 13 Oct 2026
  31. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine): material planning, what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  32. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine): rescheduling, checked 13 Oct 2026
  33. Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine): ERP integration, pricing, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  34. Monitor ERP: finite capacity, material planning, rescheduling, what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  35. Monitor ERP: ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  36. Monitor ERP: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  37. Monitor ERP: onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  38. Katana: finite capacity, checked 13 Oct 2026
  39. Katana: material planning, what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  40. Katana: rescheduling, checked 13 Oct 2026
  41. Katana: ERP integration, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  42. Katana: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  43. Oracle NetSuite: finite capacity, checked 13 Oct 2026
  44. Oracle NetSuite: material planning, what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  45. Oracle NetSuite: rescheduling, ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  46. Oracle NetSuite: pricing, onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  47. frePPLe: finite capacity, rescheduling, ERP integration, checked 13 Oct 2026
  48. frePPLe: material planning, checked 13 Oct 2026
  49. frePPLe: what-if scenarios, checked 13 Oct 2026
  50. frePPLe: pricing, checked 13 Oct 2026
  51. frePPLe: onboarding, checked 13 Oct 2026
  52. Odoo: success packs (consultant hours), checked 13 Oct 2026
  53. Oracle NetSuite: SuiteSuccess, checked 13 Oct 2026
  54. Infor SyteLine: implementation, checked 13 Oct 2026
  55. Katana: production deadlines, checked 13 Oct 2026
  56. frePPLe: command reference (plan generation), checked 13 Oct 2026
  57. Asprova: reschedule command, checked 13 Oct 2026

Change log

  • First verification. Ranks, prices, trials, material planning, rescheduling and integrations checked for twelve vendors.